Scandal Uncovered: The Fall of Matt Shirk & The Battle for Fair Districts with Andrew Pantazi
Mikes on MicApril 01, 2024
37
00:48:4733.73 MB

Scandal Uncovered: The Fall of Matt Shirk & The Battle for Fair Districts with Andrew Pantazi

Mikes on Mic - Shirk Disbarred - JEA Fraud - Redistricting with Andrew Pantazi

Tributary Reporter Andrew Pantazi joins the Mikes to discuss the history of the Public Defender’s office and how Matt Shirk came to be disbarred. 

The group also discusses the fallout from the JEA Fraud investigation and the backstory on efforts to create voting districts reflective of our diverse community. 

Stay tuned for a special surprise at the end as we celebrate Mike Tolbert’s 80th birthday.

Tune in to the show on your favorite Podcasting platform and on MikesOnMic.com

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/mikes-on-mic/id1697258731

Spotify link: https://open.spotify.com/show/1osbkLvqreSJPXmfaubY1M?si=yVwAAnw1TmSSzZnZ3vM8sA

Connect with us on Social: 

Youtube Channel: http://youtube.com/@mikesonmic 

Facebook Page link: http://facebook.com/mikesonmic

Enjoy!

[00:00:00] Mike on Mic, a conversation about politics, government and jacks of bill. With 50 year opinion

[00:00:11] leaders Mike Hightower, Mike Tolbert, an award-winning broadcaster and long-time political observer,

[00:00:17] Mike Miller.

[00:00:18] Welcome once again to another episode of Mike's on Mic, nice to have you with us on Mike

[00:00:23] Miller, Mike Hightower is with us here in studio and guess what?

[00:00:27] Mike Tolbert is actually here in studio today. This is a banner day for all of us. We're

[00:00:32] kind of celebrating too but I'm not allowed to tell you what we're celebrating because

[00:00:36] otherwise you'll get really upset with me so I'm not going to do that. Our special guest

[00:00:40] today is Andrew Fentany. Has nothing to do with the balloon. This

[00:00:44] says 80 or the cake in front. This is 80 right? Right has nothing to do with it. No,

[00:00:48] that's interstate 80. Exactly. Our guest again today is Andrew Pantazzi, founder and

[00:00:53] editor of the Jacksonville Tributary, former reporter with the Florida Times Union and of

[00:00:58] course we always enjoy having Andrew here to talk to us because of his wealth of information

[00:01:01] and his insight and perceptions and observations. Andrew nice to have you back with us.

[00:01:07] Thanks for letting me come back. All right.

[00:01:10] This gets things started Mr. Tolbert wants you to kick it off.

[00:01:13] All right Andrew thank you for being here. Let's talk for a few minutes about Matt Shirk,

[00:01:17] the recently disbar form of public defender. You wrote the Florida Supreme Court has

[00:01:22] disbar Jacksonville's disgrace, former public defender Matt Shirk once a rising Republican

[00:01:29] star who had parties that Mike Hotdauer has.

[00:01:32] Rising Republican star to parties and my criteria.

[00:01:36] Who then squandered his chances at a political future. Good night everybody.

[00:01:41] When he hired women based on their physical appearance proposition them fired them after

[00:01:46] his wife told him to the leaded public records, drank in the office, theverted campaign

[00:01:51] funds to his child's private school, violated the attorney's crime privilege of a 12 year

[00:01:57] old, paid his attorneys the lowest salaries in the state, gave away the office guns to

[00:02:02] a motorcycle club without documenting it and use the office's spending power to pay

[00:02:06] for lavish hotels.

[00:02:09] Shirk would face two criminal investigations, a grand jury, a state ethics investigation,

[00:02:14] a state auditor general investigation and multiple Florida bar complaints.

[00:02:20] Yeah, that's exhausting just to make my stress do all of that.

[00:02:26] So my memory is that it was a tributary and you that first found out that Shirk was not

[00:02:31] only up and up.

[00:02:32] Well it was the Florida Times Union at the time. About 11 years ago a colleague of mine,

[00:02:40] Tofer Sanders did the first reporting revolving around the women who he had hired and then

[00:02:47] fired after his wife told him to and then deleted the records of his wife coming into

[00:02:52] the office to demand to the firing of the women.

[00:02:55] And so that was the initial reporting and at every stage of this you dig a little bit deeper

[00:03:01] and you find there's more and more scandal and there's even far more than I was able

[00:03:05] to get to in the one summary story but over what is the whole back.

[00:03:11] Why don't we expand a little bit?

[00:03:13] Over the last 11 years I've been reporting on Matt Shirk so there's been a lot of stories.

[00:03:19] When he first was elected, I guess we can start before then.

[00:03:24] Matt Shirk's history in the public defender's history here, there had never been a contested race

[00:03:30] for public defender going back to the creation of the office 50 plus years ago.

[00:03:35] It had always been that lawyers cleared the way for one person at Austin,

[00:03:40] Lou Frost, various times that nobody decided they were going to challenge.

[00:03:48] That changed after a young assistant public defender was fired by the public defender's office.

[00:03:54] He wasn't up to snuff with what they needed from lawyers so he was fired and he decided his

[00:04:00] vengeance was going to be that he would run for elected public defender.

[00:04:03] And so he ran and elected public defender was a Democrat at the time, it was 2008

[00:04:09] and he ran very much on my opponent is going to vote for Obama so vote for me because I will not

[00:04:15] vote for Obama. And he made promises at the time, he went to the FOP, the police union and he promised

[00:04:22] I will never question the integrity of a police officer on the stand. Basically every person who

[00:04:27] is in that room has said that's what Matt Shirk said at that meeting and they endorsed him

[00:04:32] and not long after that he started questioning their integrity saying he never said that to them.

[00:04:39] And he clearly could not keep that promise as the public defender. You can't defend people and

[00:04:45] not question whether the police officer who is saying this guy is guilty is right or wrong.

[00:04:51] He gets elected before he takes office again immediately we start with some of the problems.

[00:04:59] He sends a misive to the current public defender who is still in office and he says these are

[00:05:04] the people I want fired now. He miss spells almost all of their names and it's all the top lawyers

[00:05:10] in the office. Why didn't have spell checks? So then he comes in, he brings his former law partner,

[00:05:21] he brings in friends and political allies and the person who he makes the chief assistant public

[00:05:27] defender has this astonishing record of four times courts have found him ineffective at giving

[00:05:35] counsel to defendants. I can't find anyone else in the state who that's happened twice.

[00:05:40] Like the Matt Gaetz actually at the time passed a law saying if you have been found ineffective

[00:05:48] more than once, you can no longer handle death cases. Matt Shirk and his chief assistant said

[00:05:54] we disagree the law may say that but we don't think it should be retroactive to all the cases he's

[00:05:59] handled in the past. It should only be future cases and he's still going to be the head of death penalty

[00:06:03] cases and he's still going to be the person who trains young lawyers. And so that too was running

[00:06:08] the office was somebody who was found completely ineffective time and time and time again. He probably

[00:06:14] got more people off death row by being such a bad lawyer that the courts had to keep getting them off

[00:06:19] death row because they're like we're sorry you had to deal with this man. And then his lawyers were

[00:06:25] paid the lowest in the state, which was not true beforehand and the retention rate which once

[00:06:32] had been the highest in the state year after year then fell to the lowest in the state. And so

[00:06:38] what that means for defendants, you're cycling through attorney after attorney on your complex case

[00:06:43] who you have to keep explaining what you're dealing with as you're waiting in jail and he was

[00:06:48] cycling through attorneys quickly because he was paying them so little. Let me interrupt you a

[00:06:53] minute. I won't go back to Ed Austin and Lou Frost. They were mentors. We know both of them pretty

[00:07:03] well and you both know them pretty well. Ed Austin trained young lawyers. He talked, he can go

[00:07:10] just by anywhere in Jacksonville in the courtroom and find Ed Austin trained lawyers. The same was

[00:07:16] true with Lou who was as you I think said he was a public defender for 38 years and never had

[00:07:22] opposition but he was a mentor to the lawyers his office and they did a great job quite a

[00:07:27] different story. I was telling him earlier, Lou stayed underground. He wasn't a very public person

[00:07:35] he didn't want opposition and so he just did his job over there. He wasn't looking for anything

[00:07:40] when you never saw him and I was telling him I spoke at a minute at club once

[00:07:45] with the Sheraton Hotel and I looked out, when I'm talking to him, I look out and I see Lou

[00:07:50] send a table back over there and I just stopped writing the middle of what I was saying and I said

[00:07:56] Lou Frost is that you? And he's like yeah it is. I said I am so glad to see I thought you'd die.

[00:08:06] But Lou is it and I think as we look at Matt Sher, we ought to also think about the guys who came

[00:08:13] before him that they told you that the professional, the level of professionalism and that part

[00:08:18] of being a mentor. I mean Mike and I have had that up during the work with Ed and with Lou and those

[00:08:25] the level and the depth of professionalism but they took such great pride in taking these young

[00:08:32] attorneys and mentoring but extracting from them they're very best and they all either went

[00:08:39] on to be extraordinary successful lawyers or a lot of them became judges and became respected judges

[00:08:45] by virtue of Ed and Lou mentoring. I mean they and wow it's hard to overstate in 2008 at that time

[00:08:55] how much the Jacksonville Public Defender's Office was respected nationally there was an academy

[00:09:00] award-winning documentary about a brutal arrest and a large part of that documentary is featuring

[00:09:07] the incredible work by yeah by two of the people whose names were misspelled when they were

[00:09:14] summarily fired by Matt Sher. I'm Pat McGuinness and I defend people charged with killing people.

[00:09:23] I'm Ann Finnell, I'm an attorney with Public Defender's Office in Jacksonville Florida.

[00:09:28] I went and got the victims husband and he indicated that Britain Butler was the person who shot

[00:09:36] his wife. This entire case everything important took place in two hours between seven, nine

[00:09:44] on a Sunday morning and what the jury ultimately comes to believe about those two hours is going to

[00:09:49] determine whether Brent goes to prison for life or as returned to his family.

[00:09:54] So like these are people who were getting international attention for just how good they were.

[00:10:00] Jacksonville had more death sentences than pretty much anywhere else which meant the Public Defender's Office

[00:10:06] was able to handle death sentences. They had more experience. You go elsewhere in the state and

[00:10:11] elsewhere in the country and people never have a death sentence case that they handle. Jacksonville's

[00:10:17] public defender's office had a real specialty in knowing how to handle the toughest cases and how

[00:10:22] to handle them really well. They were not being found ineffective by courts after the fact.

[00:10:27] It seems like Judge Cofur has returned the dignity to that office.

[00:10:33] I think his promise really was make the Public Defender boring again,

[00:10:40] that his goal was to not be noticed and not be written about as Public Defender to move away from

[00:10:46] scandal and move away from where anybody needs to know, hey there's a bunch of bad cases that

[00:10:53] you know bad representation or anything else. That it's kind of like a good o-line.

[00:10:58] The best o-line never gets talked about. Yeah, for Paul. One of the things is you all know

[00:11:04] he was Judge Cofur and had made an incredible reputation for himself of being steady, ethical,

[00:11:12] tough when you need to be compassionate and he brought those characteristics which was Ed

[00:11:19] and Lefrost and he brought those same characteristics. Some of it might millenile happen to see

[00:11:26] periodically for breakfast on Saturdays and he still has that incredible demeanor and he speaks

[00:11:32] and when we talk to him about the same level of humility but respect for the office and

[00:11:39] respect for the law. I mean he's a true lawyer's lawyer. What's kind of ironic is that as much

[00:11:45] as Charlie Cofur tries to stay in the background and keep his head down and everything else

[00:11:51] now that the jail issue is rising in everyone's mind. Charlie now is the go-to guy for

[00:11:58] a good solid opinion and thought and insight objective what should be going on with that

[00:12:03] we're gonna get into that a little bit later on. Let's switch gears for just a moment telling

[00:12:08] you about the J.E.A. trial we've been talking about it as you know on the show but we haven't had

[00:12:14] a chance to hear from you. Were you surprised? I was not surprised. I either verdict? No, not

[00:12:23] neither verdict. I expected Aaron's on to be convicted of something. I am a little surprised he

[00:12:29] was convicted of everything of both sets of charges and I'm not surprised that Ryan Wanamaker. I mean

[00:12:36] it's really hard to meet the burden and I think it's easier to go after the CEO. I'm glad we didn't

[00:12:43] get a situation where it was the reverse since you had separate juries it could have been possible

[00:12:48] to have Ryan Wanamaker convicted and he's not going to be convicted. Can you imagine what kind of

[00:12:51] I don't know? I just talked about the security of justice. Yeah so I think that that was pretty much

[00:12:57] what I would predict happen. I was not covering the trial so I was not in their day and day out. It's

[00:13:02] a complex case. The US Supreme Court has made it increasingly more and more difficult to prosecute

[00:13:08] these types of fraud cases. The level, the burden of proof is much higher than ever was in the 2000s

[00:13:17] and the 90s and the 80s and so it's a really tough task for a prosecutor. So I think it's a lot

[00:13:23] of credit to the work that the Times Union did to build the case as journalists and then the prosecutors

[00:13:30] did and following that reporting. I wonder what our state attorney Melissa Nelson thinks about this

[00:13:35] and whether or not she perhaps regrets kicking it down to the Fed instead of doing it herself.

[00:13:40] No, no, no, no. I think she she dies to bullet. I mean I don't think she has any regret about it.

[00:13:47] I can't imagine that. I just don't imagine. I don't believe it. You think the Fedor and her

[00:13:50] cap would have helped her out politically? I don't think she I think she didn't know that it would

[00:13:55] be a feather in her cap not one willing to take the risk. Okay, yeah. I think there was more political

[00:14:00] risks and she's willing to take and that's why she kicked the can down the road and I also think this

[00:14:05] is maybe sound nuts but when they had two juries one for Zon, one for Wannemaker everybody was going

[00:14:12] you know like what the hell is going on here? But I kind of think in the back of my mind that the

[00:14:17] Wannemaker jury sat there and heard what was being said about Zon and the defense kind of

[00:14:24] defense being run by Zon and they heard a different time of defense from Wannemaker. They probably

[00:14:30] came out of that thing with the jury room. Both groups saying that guy's an A-hole. This guy's

[00:14:37] a victim you know and I just think that probably had something to do with it. Yeah, I mean I think it

[00:14:41] hurts on too. I mean because that's Wannemaker's defense is that like you know that it's not his fault

[00:14:47] it's you know point the finger elsewhere into that hurt Zon as well. And there was enough evidence

[00:14:52] to that. Tell us what should be our takeaways from this thing Andrew and your man what should we

[00:14:56] it's what should he have learned? From your perspective I mean this was the trial that it will

[00:15:02] it's left a lot of scars let's be upfront about that there's a lot of people good people thank

[00:15:08] God that were there but there are a lot of people who should have been in that should have been

[00:15:13] at that table. Yeah, I think that we need to recognize just how close they came to doing it

[00:15:19] that it was so close to happening. I also think we need to commend the public servants who

[00:15:27] did not go along and that includes Jason Gabriel the general counsel at that. Absolutely. And it

[00:15:31] includes Kyle Billy who was able to uncover most of the corruption. I think recognizing that it

[00:15:40] would have been so easy to say there's a lot of pressure you know I'm going to just go along and

[00:15:46] you know push this through for Jason Gabriel and he did not. And I think that is something we need

[00:15:52] to recognize is that our civil servants are the ones who stepped up here it was the political

[00:15:57] appointees who failed. And that includes I think the board the board it's easy to for them to just

[00:16:04] scapegoat that they were trusting what was being presented but there was this whole narrative that

[00:16:09] J.E.A. is faltering and it's about to collapse at any moment and I think any common sense or looking

[00:16:15] at the reporting in the Times Union at the time should have alerted them to this doesn't sound right.

[00:16:20] I should be questioning what's being told to me and I really think the board failed in going along

[00:16:26] as long as they did before they stepped up and these are important positions and they can completely

[00:16:32] change the course of citizens lives and we need to be more careful. Yeah on that point the other

[00:16:38] person that that one of those heroes is Carla Miller. Yes yeah if you remember they did everything

[00:16:44] they could to block her when they went to Atlanta and it was they were I mean they went up for the whole

[00:16:50] reason if I'm not mistaken Florida Power and Light was there she wasn't allowed to be in the room

[00:16:58] she basically budgeted and they wouldn't let her take notes. If y'all remember what she did

[00:17:02] was she would step out go to the bathroom and write on toilet paper what was going on and come back

[00:17:06] they would not let her check and they were gonna check her notes and she just was adamant

[00:17:11] and came back. I mean you talk about wanting to do the right add-on so I can remember when John

[00:17:18] Mike Talbot now worked for he used to say you're never wrong if you do the right thing for the right

[00:17:22] reason I remember he used to say that you know we're talking about those people at the board let's

[00:17:29] talk about the political side of this town of how close it came it's there was more than just

[00:17:34] complicit on some elected officials would you not agree? Oh yeah no the the trial was not a criminal

[00:17:41] indictment and it doesn't seem like the there's enough evidence to get to that level but it is an

[00:17:47] indictment morally of Mayor Lenny Curry in the pressure that was being built I mean he picked

[00:17:55] Aaron Zahn for this purpose to sell J.E.A. and Aaron Zahn did not have experience if you remember

[00:18:03] another public servant to praise out of this the first person to raise a stink about Aaron Zahn

[00:18:10] was Matt Schalenberg when he was on council he was the liaison to J.E.A. and Matt Schalenberg

[00:18:15] believed Aaron Zahn did not have the credentials to be CEO you're right he was criticizing his

[00:18:20] appointment as CEO so even before any of the sale plan came out the bonus plan came out like we

[00:18:28] had some people who were criticizing and they were just being shoved to the side as curmudgeons as

[00:18:34] people who always complain people who can be ignored and I think that's true for the reporting as

[00:18:39] well that was coming out that it was easy to just say oh well don't trust the naysayers I think

[00:18:44] there was like a direct quote at the time that that Curry was saying is don't trust the media with

[00:18:48] their reporting yeah if we remember one of your former colleagues our own that uh... uh... Nathan

[00:18:56] Row they put uh... that spice following I mean I think on his honeymoon I think they followed

[00:19:02] or they were on vacation he was going to a wedding yeah and they followed you know because he was

[00:19:07] writing about it yeah you probably saw from our last show uh... Mike Talbert brought up in that

[00:19:12] clip of Jake going in there and having his say and then having the merry curry come down there

[00:19:19] and really basically tried to stick it to both both to Curry but to reassure those city councilman

[00:19:26] there you do this I'm not gonna don't laugh I will not allow y'all not to proceed with that yeah

[00:19:33] it was Jake's final act was protecting J.E.A. and I think that's also such a great

[00:19:39] way to be able to remember him by is that you know he was kicking and screaming

[00:19:45] the whole time he did that a lot it was textbook textbook textbook Jake

[00:19:51] and you know what as you saw that emotion I mean it makes even more textbook Jake is the fact

[00:19:56] that he endorsed Curry and then is independent enough which I think has been something that was

[00:20:01] also true throughout Jake's life is and endorsement does not mean I'm not going to be on you

[00:20:08] the entire time you're an officer nobody can talk about that better than the relationship with Jake

[00:20:13] and my Talbert right away let me give you a backstory Jake was so upset about the proposed

[00:20:20] sale of the thought of selling J.E.A. the way they were trying to do it and I remember when they

[00:20:26] were trying to get his endorsement we had lunch over at River City Brewery in the bar like we did

[00:20:33] often with Curry Hughes Brian Hughes and Sam Moosa and Jake kept saying if I don't know where

[00:20:44] I'm going to endorse you is you're gonna put out a statement that says that you will not consider

[00:20:49] selling the J.E.A. you know I'll endorse if you do that and they him hold around I mean they dance

[00:20:56] then they I mean it was unbelievable and when they left when we knew that they weren't going to do

[00:21:03] a damn thing and Jake says write a statement for me and send it over and tell them if they put this

[00:21:09] out out endorsement not they can go to hell and that's exactly what I did and they didn't endorse

[00:21:15] him yeah I mean they didn't they wouldn't put the statement out those guys were I mean they're

[00:21:20] they're greasy as they can be they were attacking Annabra Shea who was at the time the council

[00:21:25] president running against Curry for mayor and she was making her campaign about he's going to sell

[00:21:31] J.E.A. and they were very insulting to her she's now the city's finance director but she's another

[00:21:37] one who was out there speaking early on and going against you know the the Republican power

[00:21:43] structure that she very easily could have been a part of and could have been another player in a

[00:21:49] council president who was assisted by I think some of the same people initially and getting

[00:21:54] elected and she again saw things were going wrong and was willing to risk her political future

[00:22:02] to be able to stand up and say this is what's happening I will tell you Mike you know Mike

[00:22:07] has been at this couple years more than I but the two of us were over 110 years those two men

[00:22:15] Curry or three of Curry Hughes Baker their philosophy was scorched earth and it wasn't about winning

[00:22:22] it was annihilating the opposition and it didn't matter and anything goes I mean

[00:22:28] and truth was not part of the thing it was annihilating anyone who opposed them so given that

[00:22:34] I'm gonna key this up now that this trial is over we've now seen it have not heard much

[00:22:41] what we call it attrition from them where do the where do people like Curry, Brian Hughes, Tim Baker

[00:22:50] where are they in Jacksonville history what do you think their reputation is or should be

[00:22:55] two part yeah I was gonna say that's two questions two questions what's your feeling

[00:23:01] I think it's it's really hard to say this close to the end of Curry's second term

[00:23:07] how he will fit in he oversaw years of tremendous economic growth when the country as a whole had

[00:23:16] the lowest interest rates it's ever had and had a growing economy and a time when you could borrow a lot

[00:23:23] it was the most ideal time to be able to invest a lot of money into building things

[00:23:30] and got a lot of money from the feds and help us with that too and I think we didn't I think it's

[00:23:35] we did not yes okay I was gonna ask her so I think where are the cranes where were the cranes

[00:23:40] I think it's it's a hard it's a hard place to be in Jacksonville history because it's kind of what's

[00:23:46] not there which is it's not like during mayor Curry's administration things were getting worse

[00:23:52] in Jacksonville things were getting better everywhere they were getting better here too but other

[00:23:56] cities were using this rare moment in history one I don't think this country will ever see again

[00:24:02] like Tampa Nashville many other places that said we're gonna use the low interest rates

[00:24:07] to really invest in our downtown building up our infrastructure doing a lot of things the things

[00:24:13] we were spending money on were like destroying the heart bridge ramp which is hard to see how that

[00:24:19] fits into the amount of money we spent on that versus the return that we're hoping one day maybe

[00:24:25] we will get it's hard to imagine that we could have squandered that opportunity more when you look

[00:24:32] at downtown right now we could have done a lot more it's a hard legacy because again it's not

[00:24:38] like during those times we were not you know that we were doing bad things necessarily or we were

[00:24:44] cutting budgets we had a rising budget every year we were investing more money in things we just

[00:24:49] could have done a lot more because of where the economy was at it's it's a sharp contrast with

[00:24:54] Mayor Delaney who I think also facing a rising economy you know passes the BJP which is transformative

[00:25:01] for Jacksonville and will always transform what Jacksonville has become with its environmental

[00:25:06] preservation in particular I think you look at Mayor Payton and his work during reducing budgets

[00:25:15] to find ways to raise fees to find ways pitching the childcare tax which never city council never

[00:25:20] approved but pitching increased revenue and building the jack's journey despite a recession

[00:25:26] I think that becomes part of his legacy I think both Mayor Alvin Brown and Mayor Courier it's hard

[00:25:32] to see quite as much pension definitely that that that would be the biggest thing for him is that

[00:25:40] passing the pension tax to deal with that finally getting that off of the plate at least

[00:25:46] for the time being that that is a big deal that is worth being high up there in his legacy it's just

[00:25:53] hard to imagine what was act two after that quick act one speaking of federal funding and the availability

[00:26:00] of funding back in those days I'm just wondering how that might relate to what we're talking about now

[00:26:05] with the jail could we have used those dollars to offset what that billion dollar price tag is supposed

[00:26:11] to be when we get into this certainly one of our favorite topics we need to make sure everybody heard

[00:26:16] what Mike Melda just said there is that we're looking at a proposed billion dollar jail

[00:26:24] at minimum I mean I can't honestly the talking real money here guys like it's going to be very

[00:26:30] expensive when we look at the projects that are happening elsewhere in the country when it comes

[00:26:34] to jails they are running higher than that and smaller higher than a billion jails are very expensive

[00:26:40] these are not like other infrastructure projects what you are building is so there's so many layers

[00:26:45] to what you have to get there and especially if we want to do it right so yeah I definitely think

[00:26:51] those years when money was cheap you didn't even need to bond for cheap money you could directly

[00:26:57] loan money at low interest rates and so you for people who don't understand the way bonding

[00:27:02] uses your works is you have to get a tax that it's tied to that you are putting up for a referendum

[00:27:08] this is dedicated mill from your property taxes or dedicated sales tax that is funding this bond

[00:27:15] otherwise you do direct lending which is usually high interest rates at that time we had low

[00:27:19] interest rates we could have directly lended and we could have been able to really finance

[00:27:24] a significant part of this not to mention labor was cheap at the time materials were cheap

[00:27:30] at the time it was the ideal time to build anything you wanted and we did not build the jail then

[00:27:36] we did not even fund much maintenance at the jail turns out right and nor did we look at the health

[00:27:42] care issues that were going on the jail so during that time not only did we when you think of

[00:27:49] opportunities lost eight years of opportunities lost I'm not sure that kicking the can on the

[00:27:56] pension is something that my kids generation or my granddaughters generation is going to think

[00:28:01] it's at great at this point but think of those eight years that we lost when money was cheap and we

[00:28:07] could have had to think about how Jake brought the business community how you know how John Delaney

[00:28:13] put together the better Jacksonville plan and that how John Peyton when times were tough and had

[00:28:19] the courage to talk about you know we had to do these taxes these taxes and the better Jacksonville

[00:28:24] plan by the journey the Jacksonville journey which made a difference in the communities which

[00:28:31] were having crime issues and made a difference so when you kind of look back take the pension out

[00:28:37] what else what is the quality of life in Jacksonville during these eight years except for a scandal

[00:28:42] of x y and z so I ask you can I change the subject for yeah go ahead we beat this horse to death

[00:28:49] it's it really takes me off it's health care at the jail any better now that we've seen

[00:28:55] with half care it remains to be seen we've seen a number of inmates that's already

[00:28:59] changed for yeah really it is up to four yeah this year yeah just so far in 2024 and this is first

[00:29:07] of the murder and this is the first quarter yeah January February March yeah so we're already

[00:29:11] seeing that was the unsolicited bid that we got right yes yes so it was the goesboro County yeah

[00:29:17] yeah it was the single source bid for a hundred five million dollar contract um we don't know yet

[00:29:23] um anecdotally I think we're hearing that it's it's better than armor armor was very bad

[00:29:29] um that doesn't mean it's good um and that still remains to be seen and we're still reporting and

[00:29:34] digging we have a lot more work that we're working on when it comes to the jail health care in the

[00:29:39] jail in general so what's going on with this committee the jail committee where where's it what's

[00:29:43] the status of that when we're gonna know something about that when are we gonna say the pretty

[00:29:47] rendering so the way this is going to work is the jail committee that so the city council has a

[00:29:54] special committee to work on the jail and they have a lot of gas who they've invited onto working

[00:29:59] groups um sub working groups they're gonna put together a full recommendation a report

[00:30:06] the sheriff can ignore that the sheriff doesn't have to it's not binding it's not saying here's

[00:30:09] what we are going to do it's saying here's what we believe would be best um for the jail moving

[00:30:16] forward um but for all we know the sheriff could say I'm hiring my own consultant to do this and

[00:30:22] I'm going to ignore the recommendations of the city council kind of answer my next question

[00:30:28] because you behave their behavior tributary wrote uh something that Charles Cove with the public

[00:30:33] defender said over the last 30 years has been a recognition that if we want to deal with the back

[00:30:39] into crime arresting people and prosecuting them we need to also focus on the prevention of crime

[00:30:45] by dealing better with mental health and recidivism and I was going to ask you if that opinion by judge

[00:30:52] Cove is shared by the sheriff um in every conversation and not just the sheriff I'll say this was true

[00:31:00] with the conversation I had with councilman Boilin as well where I was asking

[00:31:04] it our numbers gonna be a part of this then the fact that they're so overcrowded which is a result

[00:31:10] of many decisions JSO makes and he kept saying no no we're not gonna you know that's for the sheriff

[00:31:16] to decide um his policies there because we are an outlier when it comes to specifically civil

[00:31:22] citations yeah um most other counties and we're talking Santa Rosa we're talking scambia we're talking

[00:31:30] you know Hillsboro we're talking you know I think like citrus and hernando and places like that

[00:31:37] very republican counties all of those have republican sheriffs um but ours is very opposed to

[00:31:43] the concept of civil citations what do we know he says um if you're an adult you need to expect

[00:31:49] consequences for committing a crime um well I think a lot of the people a lot of the elected law

[00:31:56] enforcement officials across the state have recognized is there are laws in the books that are

[00:32:02] technically crimes but can be handled civilly that you can give them a citation avoid the criminal

[00:32:06] arrest um think of assault um you know misdemeanor assault is um I say I'm going to beat you up

[00:32:15] and that is misdemeanor assault and if you're saying you're always gonna treat that as a crime

[00:32:19] and you're never gonna say okay you shouldn't have done that you shouldn't have said that here's

[00:32:22] a citation you have to pay this off you have to deal with this um but we're not gonna give you

[00:32:27] criminal record instead we're saying no we are always gonna do the criminal record that is the

[00:32:32] route we're going with um and that's the sheriff's very strong belief he has to his credit he has

[00:32:39] answered questions about this he has met with groups that have asked him to change and he has stood

[00:32:43] firm on he has not opened the change he's not um open to reconsidering that he is going to continue

[00:32:49] that and that's one of the factors that fills up our jail um is not offering alternatives to

[00:32:55] the criminal legal system for some of these incidents that that happen and so maybe maybe

[00:33:00] the arrest rate looks better when you do that you know the number of arrests or it's a good political

[00:33:05] sound bite or for a bumper sticker if you're if you're trying to do a long order candidate if that's

[00:33:11] what you're looking to do well I'm sort of thinking back you've chose my age here you know

[00:33:16] chinging Charlie ran on that yeah to be governor and then tried to do is you know I'm change I mean

[00:33:23] sounds great makes everybody feel good think you're doing you're taking an axe to it but

[00:33:28] you know at the long at the end of the day what's the long term outcome of that you fill up a jailing

[00:33:34] I'll I'll say I mean I'm for all law and order forgot but there's a difference between somebody

[00:33:41] that you can rehabilitate and not sit there and then put a felony charge on them and then hope to

[00:33:48] God when they get out that they're going to find a job and get back in society but unfortunately

[00:33:53] we haven't got everybody in society or the business community who's willing to take a risk on

[00:33:57] somebody it was a felony doesn't matter if it's a small felony or a big a felony if it says felony

[00:34:02] on your job application it's tough out there I have every reason to believe this is what he actually

[00:34:09] deepened his heart thinks is the right decision but then the consequences are what do we do with

[00:34:14] these people get out in number two now we're going to look at a billion dollar plus jail to house

[00:34:18] these people I mean it's money money you spend on keeping them in jail money you spend on

[00:34:23] prosecuting them money you spend on arresting them that's money that is not being spent on alternatives

[00:34:30] either that's money not being spent on options like the jacks journey it it costs money and I think

[00:34:35] that's not something that people are thinking about is that there needs to be some degree of cost

[00:34:40] benefit analysis not just an assumption of we're going to do this because we said we're going to

[00:34:44] do this and we're not going to consider whether there's any even literal financial cost to it by

[00:34:50] the way I saw a story I believe it was yesterday maybe the day before that the program cure violence

[00:34:55] which we adopted here a couple of years ago which I understand was operating in three different

[00:35:00] sections of the city and the west side north and east sides as a crime prevention type program I think

[00:35:06] we borrowed it from Chicago if I'm not mistaken there were the ones who did this but it's no longer

[00:35:11] being funded so it's folded I haven't seen that well so and I'm sitting there and I was a TV

[00:35:17] story now I was seeing they're just staring at it saying how did such a highly talented program is

[00:35:22] this and then I started thinking about I'm saying well we did it to the jacks of old journey and

[00:35:26] that was also doing very well and how's that working for exactly exactly so so let's talk about

[00:35:32] gerrymandering change lanes now let's change lanes okay recently you reported that a federal

[00:35:40] judge decided not to order special elections for racially gerrymandered school board seats

[00:35:46] that means school board members Darryl Willie and Charlotte Joyce won't have to face a special

[00:35:50] election this year this has been a long history in Jacksonville in fact the tributary reported back

[00:35:55] as far as 1981 voters had raised concerns about racial gerrymandering but were ignored by city

[00:36:01] council members tell us a latest on this and explain and give us a little bit of the history

[00:36:07] yeah you went into great depth yeah I'll give a quick history it when the city was consolidated

[00:36:14] the initial plan by the task force that studied and made the recommendations was that we were

[00:36:20] going to have 22 council districts and this was very important because there was a lot of black

[00:36:25] leaders who were expressing concerns at the time jacks of old had a history of going back and forth

[00:36:29] between district and at large depending on black population we had districts up until the 40s

[00:36:36] when a black man almost won a district and then we switched at large until the 60s when all of

[00:36:43] a sudden it looked like it was going to flip where maybe all at large seats would be elected by

[00:36:48] black representatives so we switched back to districts where we got Sally Beemathus and Mary

[00:36:54] Singleton elected in the first election and so there was this concern that hey you're consolidating

[00:36:58] with the county you're going to go all at large and there won't be any black representation

[00:37:03] anymore it's your bringing in the white suburbs there were promises made that there will be zero

[00:37:07] none and none at all at large seats on city council that we're going to do 22 council districts

[00:37:13] it goes to the legislature the legislature debates it in some of the more conservative

[00:37:20] conservative senator in particular said no I don't like that we're going to switch to 14 districts

[00:37:24] and five at large okay fine but it was still designed that was supposed to be independent city

[00:37:29] council's not the one doing this we have an independent process that changed after only one cycle

[00:37:35] in 1971 so 1980 it's now up to city council and they're having to deal with this and they're being

[00:37:43] told a lot of mixed things about what they legally have to do the law was still pretty unsettled on how

[00:37:50] to comply with the voting rights act in these districts and so they got bad advice they were told

[00:37:55] the law requires 65% black districts that is what means a voting rights district there was no court

[00:38:02] ruling ever that that found that that was a theory that was being spread around that was like a

[00:38:06] rumor spreading all across the south and it's really hard to pinpoint where it began but that was

[00:38:11] not actually what was required by the courts the result of it was we started making these districts

[00:38:16] that were super packed very high populations of black voters which meant they didn't have as much

[00:38:23] power in the other districts the actual standard is you're supposed to determine what would allow

[00:38:29] black voters to elect their preferred candidates whatever that may be and that may be in one district 41

[00:38:35] percent another it may be 65% at the same time when we look at the legislature you know Betty

[00:38:43] holes in Dorf's district all across the legislature and Jacksonville the black districts were in

[00:38:50] the 40s the 40 percent range they were not nearly as high which also speaks to how inflated this was

[00:38:57] this continued in 91 a lot of the same council members are still on council and like I remember how

[00:39:02] this was done 10 years ago let's continue doing it like this a lot of those same council members are

[00:39:06] on there in 2001 and they're like I remember how we do this we're going to keep doing this continues

[00:39:11] in 2011 where in fact they are even more so you have Denise Lee saying we need to get more

[00:39:16] black people for my district you have Jason Gabriel saying you can't say that and she's like fine

[00:39:21] black cows whatever I have to say I want more brown cows than I want white cows in my district

[00:39:28] and she keeps pushing them to increase the numbers and every single time going back to 1981 you

[00:39:35] have black neighborhood organization leaders coming out saying stop splitting up our neighborhoods

[00:39:42] give us fair compact districts we don't need this and every time they're dismissed as you don't

[00:39:47] know what you're talking about where the experts here where the council members we know best

[00:39:51] and they ignore them what the challenge was this time was that we again did this in 2021

[00:40:00] largely councilwoman Brenda Priestly Jackson leading the effort to pack black voters into these four

[00:40:05] districts and the challenge had to go into the history because so much of what she said is let's not

[00:40:11] change things let's keep things the way they are let's keep them at the same percentages and so it's

[00:40:16] having to go back to what was the original basis and finding that for decades black voters have

[00:40:21] been jerrymandered and what makes it even worse is the city council draws the school board districts

[00:40:26] and the school board districts are just two council districts combined together and so the

[00:40:30] school board has also been racially jerrymandered but there was a weird twist in kind of how the case

[00:40:38] presented itself they were challenging the city council districts in 2021 they were not technically

[00:40:45] challenging 2011 other than to say the 2011 is proof that they unconstitutionally did it then

[00:40:50] and then they wanted to continue that unconstitutional but because they didn't literally challenge

[00:40:56] the court order which found 2011 unconstitutional but it wasn't ruling that it was unconstitutional

[00:41:01] which means it's really complicated but that's why there's no special election so those school board

[00:41:06] seats were struck down but they'll still have the same school board members in the new districts

[00:41:13] without a special election i just wonder you know with the trend today of dismantling all of the

[00:41:20] DEI programs across the country whether it be in private companies or higher education or whatever

[00:41:27] this trend i'm wondering if that's going to find its way now into the issue of jerrymandering and

[00:41:33] them those that are opposed to DEI it's diversity equity and inclusion are going to say well wait a

[00:41:40] minute jerrymandering is nothing more than a political extension of jerrymandering or DEI and if

[00:41:47] that if the courts are going to start looking at that and saying well you know what maybe they're

[00:41:51] right here if the idea of giving any kind of special privilege to any person of color goes against

[00:41:59] what the trend is now to do away with DEI. And that's what governor de santis did with his congressional

[00:42:05] map he was arguing that parts of the voting rights act that voters in florida enacted into our

[00:42:10] state constitution are unconstitutional that trying to protect black voters right to elect their

[00:42:18] preferred candidates is unconstitutional because you can't consider race ever historically the courts

[00:42:25] have not gone along with that they've said in narrowly tailored specific ways you can't just use

[00:42:30] race and obsess over race but if you have a specific purpose and you're not going beyond that

[00:42:36] and that's where we got the old congressional district five it couldn't be the squiggly lines

[00:42:42] if you're old enough to remember like the 91 original map the 92 map that like went and picked up

[00:42:48] part of placa went and picked up part of Daytona Beach and part of Orlando Jacksonville and that

[00:42:53] was struck down that was you obsessed about race too much and the courts kept striking down and saying

[00:42:57] you need you need to draw a district that protects black voters ability to elect their preferred

[00:43:02] candidate but you also need to not obsess that much where you're drawing these ridiculous shapes

[00:43:07] and that's where we ended up with the Jacksonville to tell hasi fairly compact but still taking into

[00:43:13] account how can we give black voters representation and that's what de santis has opposed and continues

[00:43:19] to oppose commercial time yes sir Andrew real quick before I will allow you for a commercial which

[00:43:25] we do want uh why don't you got coming in the queue what are we what do we expect from the tributary

[00:43:31] give us give us a hit so we and then and then we'll do a commercial for you tell us why you're

[00:43:35] coming on our show yeah come on we actually have um chum the water we have four stories right now

[00:43:41] that we're finishing up that are all really incredible uh two two of them are local um and focused

[00:43:47] on the sheriff's office um and two more are statewide in nature and I think are going to be really

[00:43:52] important in showing some of the issues that the state is having with procurement um in the lack of

[00:43:58] anybody uh watchdogging uh how procurement is playing out so keep an eye out for that that you

[00:44:05] can keep an eye out at jackstrib.org where you can subscribe for free to our newsletter get every

[00:44:10] story that we publish and we're a nonprofit so please donate we exist entirely off reader donations

[00:44:17] and so readers who support us are supporting the work of me and my co-workers Nicole Mana and

[00:44:23] Charles Charlie McGee who are doing really good work and rely on jacksons who care about local news

[00:44:30] right you're you're just a treasure to we are and if all of y'all listen to us uh we need them back

[00:44:37] so uh think about contributing to the please do support tributary thank you for being here thank

[00:44:42] you so much Mike Mike and Mike yeah before we wrap things up as I said today is kind of a special

[00:44:47] day so we're not allowed to say what it is but uh but we do have one way of showing you how we're

[00:44:56] celebrating this particular day

[00:45:17] how many candidates as Mike's all her no on their way up to camp it all here

[00:45:26] and how many people reach all the drag and how many truly made them

[00:45:35] the answer of course is in the inside source the answer is in the inside source

[00:45:43] how many times can a man change his party and hide from my Harvard's detention

[00:45:53] how many fish must be fried every year so someone can win any election

[00:46:00] and how many races are won and are lost and where can you read the prediction

[00:46:10] the answer of course is in the inside source the answer is in the inside source

[00:46:20] how many times will near a stumble and fall before he decides to move on

[00:46:27] and how many homes in all the levels fall before he's packed up at gold

[00:46:37] and have any shares of the audience down and Mike's all worked by from Paul Khan

[00:46:45] the answer of course is in the inside source the answer is in the inside source

[00:46:54] now that the source is a thing of the past where will my tall bird land next

[00:47:03] will he go straight for Jake or just run a campaign or will he just stay at CSX

[00:47:12] and how long can tall birds stay out of the game when he says it's better than sex

[00:47:19] the man will miss the dis course and for the inside source we all miss the great inside song

[00:47:31] happy birthday

[00:47:38] we got for you you got the original oh yeah oh yeah that's not the original yeah that's the original

[00:47:44] that is yeah how be damned yeah

[00:47:47] I'm sorry read

[00:47:48] they read Eric Smith Dan Kassoff Jordan Logan

[00:47:53] wow that was Scott Westerman by the way our executive producer thank you all very much for joining us

[00:47:59] this week next week Nat Ford's going to be here we're gonna use the CEO of the JTA

[00:48:03] Jacksville Transportation Authority my whole boss we're gonna be talking about the big

[00:48:08] 147 million dollar federal grant we got for the M.O. Trail and for the electronic autonomous

[00:48:13] vehicles and we'll be talking about all of that with Nat Ford Nat Ford next week so we hope

[00:48:18] you'll be tuning in for that thanks for joining us please catch us on your favorite podcast source

[00:48:23] and we'll talk to you soon bye bye thank you thank you

[00:48:26] mics on mic with Mike Tolbert Mike Hightower and Mike Miller can be found on your favorite

[00:48:32] podcasting platform Facebook and YouTube visit the website at micsonmic.com join us next time from

[00:48:40] more conversation with mics on mic